OIAC   |   Wednesday, April 18th 2018

OIAC deplores the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) hosting of the Iranian regime’s foreign minister Javad Zarif next week.

We will hold a rally outside the venue beginning at 5pm EST.”– OIAC

WASHINGTON, DC, USA, April 18, 2018 /EINPresswire.com/ — Washington, DC; April 18, 2018

Organization of Iranian American Communities (OIAC) deplores the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) hosting of the Iranian regime’s foreign minister Javad Zarif next week. To show its outrage, OIAC will hold a rally outside the venue beginning at 5pm EST.

Zarif’s appearance at the Council is an affront to the millions of Iranians whose chants of “death to Khamenei, death to Rouhani,” “Hardliner, Reformer, the game is now over,” during the January 2018 uprising in 142 cities demonstrated in no uncertain terms the illegitimacy of the ruling theocracy.
We are reminded daily that Zarif and his masters in Tehran have executed at least 3,500 Iranians (many in public) since Hassan Rouhani took office, making this regime the leading per capita executioner of its own citizens. Since January 2018, over 60 people have been murdered for their role in nationwide protests.
This invitation is all the more regrettable in view of Tehran’s malign activities in Syria, Yemen, Lebanon, Iraq, and beyond.

We invite all human rights organizations, NGOs and concerned citizens to join us.

We urge the panel moderator, Stephen Hadley to ask Zarif the following questions:

– How many Iranian protesters have lost their lives while in custody during the recent uprising?
– Why is Alireza Avaie, a key official responsible for the massacre of thousands of dissidents in 1988 the Justice Minister in Rouhani’s cabinet?
– Why GOI has not allowed the UN reporter on human rights in Iran to visit Iran in nearly three decades?
– Why is GOI providing ballistic missiles to Yemen in contravention of UN Security Council Resolution 2216, banning the export of weapons to the Houthis?
– Why is GOI spending at least $6bn of the Iranian nations wealth to prop up the murderous Assad regime?

About OIAC: The Organization of Iranian-American communities-US (OIAC), all-volunteers non-profit organization, believes democracy and human rights in Iran are imperative to the national security of America and peace in the Middle East and beyond.

Dr. Majid Sadeghpour
Organization of Iranian American Communities-US (OIAC)

 

By Mehrnoush Cheragh Abadi   |   EQUAL TIMES
9 April 2018

“Dedicating [only] one day to the labourer, is as though we dedicate [only] one day to the light, [or only] one day to the sun,” said Ayatollah Khomeini, Iran’s first Supreme Leader. “Every day is the day of the light, and every day is the day of the sun,” he continued, on the occasion of first May Day celebrations after the 1979 revolution in Iran.

But it has been 39 years since the revolution and Iran’s working people are still waiting for their moment in the sun. Independent trade unions are banned, workers in public companies have to wait months for their wages, labourers in the private sector work under precarious conditions, and if unionists demand their rights, they are silenced with an iron fist.

“[It was] only during the first two years after the revolution when the labour movement had a chance to flourish in Iran,” says Canada-based Iranian labour activist Mehdi Kouhestaninejad.

But like all autocratic regimes, the Iran government feels threatened by any attempts to secure the basic rights of its citizens. The more time that passes from the 1979 revolution, the more scared the Iranian government has become.

“When the Islamic regime intensified its brutal crackdown on the opposition in the early 1980s, workers’ activists and unionists were not exempt from the horrendous suppression,” Kouhestaninejad adds.

Today, workers in Iran have no guarantee or protection of their rights. As Jamshid Ahmadi, an Iranian activist working with the Union of Metalworkers and Mechanics of Iran (UMMI) told the global trade union federation Industrial in 2014:

“In Iran only Islamic labour councils are accepted but they are not trade unions – they are tripartite organisations bringing together the Ministry of Labour, the employers and some selected workers based on their loyalties and religious affiliations to the government. As a result, they are inappropriate and ill-equipped to deal with the demands and needs of Iranian workers.”

Furthermore, according to the 2017 International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) Global Rights Index, any collective action by Iranian unionists “is repressed with violence and strikes are impeded by security forces, riot police and the militia.”

Owen Tudor, head of international relations at the UK’s Trades Union Congress (TUC) tells Equal Times:

“Iran likes to portray itself as a theocratic democracy, run according to Islamic principles. In reality, it is a kleptocracy, where the people in power use their authority to steal from working people.”

One of the main issues that Iranian workers face is the late payment of wages. Over the last decade, it has become normal for employers to be consistently late in paying its employees, due in part to the international sanctions against Iran, but also to the high levels of corruption in the country.

Iranian workers have no recourse to justice. “No law supports the workers. They are not allowed to establish unions, and the entire economy – regardless of being private or public – is run buy the Revolutionary Guard [a powerful subset of the country’s military],” Kouhestaninejad adds. “In such conditions, workers are not only deprived of their wages but of their basic rights, too.”

In 2017, over 600 workers at the Forghani Textile Group worked unpaid for five months. Forghani is a large industrial group that consists of five companies exporting its products to south-east Asia.

Another large firm, Faravardehaye Roghanie Iran Company (FRICO), which produces vegetable oil, failed to pay its workers for four months, and on 25 February 2018, workers at the Qazvin Foolad Company demonstrated against delayed payments and benefits of about three million Tomans (about US$800).

Successful collective actions

Despite serious attacks on trade union rights in Iran, the arbitrary arrests of unionists and long prison sentences for leading union activists, independent trade unions continue to fight for the rights of Iranian workers. One recent example of such efforts is the successful strike at the Haft Tapeh Sugarcane Plantation and Industry Company.

On 2 December, workers at Haft Tapeh, a company with 5,700 employees and an estimated turnover of US$100 million, went on strike to demand overdue benefits and wages. Finally, on 21 February, after over two months of strikes and protests, the company paid all delayed payments to its employees.

“The Haft Tapeh workers won their back wages through the classic methods of collective action,” explains Peter Rossman, director of international campaigns and communications at the International Union of Food Workers (IUF).

In Rossman’s opinion, the workers at Haft Tapeh were successful because “they refused to be divided”, “they were clear in their demands”, and “they refused to be provoked in the face of the brutality of the management and the local authorities”.

This was not the first strike in Haft Tapeh, an archaeological site in southern Iran, whereupon the industrial complex was built. In 2008, workers established an independent union at the company, and since then, the name ‘Haft Tapeh’ has become synonymous with protest-related news.

For Rossman, the success of its most recent strike action underscores the importance of unions in industrial relations in Iran.

“Ultimately, the company [Haft Tapeh] was forced to yield, which is a form of de facto recognition that the union exists, that it speaks for the workers and that the company cannot ignore them,” Rossman emphasises.

Meanwhile, protests against working conditions have not been limited to Haft Tapeh. On 5 February, workers at the Heavy Equipment Production Company (HEPCO) protested in the central city of Arak, demanding six months of unpaid wages. On 23 February, a group of workers at the Iran National Steel Industrial Group in the southern city of Ahwaz held a protest calling for four months’ unpaid salaries for 4,000 workers.

A week later, 10 workers were arrested by security forces during night-time raids conducted on their homes. A day after the Ahwaz protest, workers at the Orumieh Steel Group demonstrated in the western city of Orumieh, also for unpaid wages.

Over the past two decades, consecutive governments have witnessed countless protests and strikes by labourers, drivers, teachers, merchants in grand bazaars, and even goldsmiths. In contrast with previous industrial actions, the most current labour strikes have attracted enormous international attention because they coincided with the wave of anti-government protests that rocked Iran in December 2017 and January 2018.

After harsh suppression by the government, the social protests did not last long. However, Iranian unionists and labour activists have not stopped the fight for their rights, despite facing persecution and incarceration.

Unionists in prison

“Without question, workers’ rights are human rights,” says Amnesty International’s Iran researcher Nassim Papayianni. “By criminalising peaceful trade union activities and banning the formation of independent trade unions, the Iranian authorities are flagrantly violating their human rights obligations under international law.”

In Iran today, a number of union leaders are serving long prison sentences. Esmail Abdi of the Iran Teachers’ Trade Association is currently in jail, serving a six-year prison sentence on trumped-up charges of national security offences after organising protests. A board member of the Syndicate of Workers of Tehran and Suburbs Bus Company, Reza Shahabi, is another unionist who spent five years in prison on the same charges as Abdi. Shahabi was finally released on 13 March 2018.

Other Iranian labour activists, such as Mansour Osanlou now living in the United States, were forced to leave Iran after their imprisonment. In 2015, Shahrokh Zamani, a jailed member of the House Painters Workers’ Union in Iran, died of a stroke after prison authorities refused him medical treatment.

“These workers and trade unionists are human rights defenders,” Papayianni explains to Equal Times. “They are striving to ensure the right of everyone to form and join trade unions, and to enjoy just and favourable conditions of employment, social security and an adequate standard of living.”

In response to recent pressure on union activists, Amnesty International is calling on Iran to “quash the harsh prison sentences that have been handed down to trade unionists” and for the authorities to “lift their repressive and unlawful ban” on independent trade unions.

Meanwhile, in the light of current events in Haft Tapeh, the question for Iranian unionists is what steps should they take to protect their basic rights in a struggle with employers who enjoy the full support of the government and the judiciary?

“Other trade union movements around the world have faced similar obstacles and challenges to those in Iran,” Tudor says. “The long traditions of worker organisation have clearly given the Iranian working class a head start.

“In Zimbabwe,” he concludes, “our colleagues in the ZCTU [Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions] say ‘It is darkest before dawn, the struggle intensifies’ and that also applies in Iran. The bravery and commitment of those who run the trade unions that struggle even to exist in Iran inspires confidence in the future, as well as respect.”

https://www.equaltimes.org/iranian-workers-are-not-only#.WsuEDYjwZPa

 

 

AUGUSTA FREE PRESS

AUGUSTA FREE PRESS   |   Moe Alafchi   |   March 6, 2018

The nationwide protests in Iran, which began on December 28 in Mashhad, gave voice to the economic frustration of ordinary Iranians, but quickly expanded to slogans like “death to [President] Rouhani”, “death to the dictator”, and “reformists, conservatives: the game is over.” In short, the protesters were demanding democratic change in Iran.

To no one’s surprise, Iranian authorities responded violently, with at least 8,000 arrests and upwards of 50 deaths. The predictability of the suppression should have prepared Western policymakers to respond appropriately and effectively.

Despite such brutality, the protests have continued. Earlier this week, several Iranian cities, including Isfahan, Shiraz, Gorgan, Arak, Bandar Abbas, Bushehr, and Khorramabad were the scenes of protests, in which young people were repeating the slogans as those in the protesters in early January.

The theocratic dictatorship has a virtually uninterrupted record of human rights abuses dating back to the immediate aftermath of the 1979 revolution. Struggling to retain its hold on power near the end of the Iran-Iraq War, then-Supreme Leader Ruhollah Khomeini issued a fatwa ordering the mass execution of prisoners deemed a political threat.

In 1988, an estimated 30,000 political prisoners were hanged or shot after being briefly interrogated about their political affiliations. The vast majority were members of the Mujahedin-e Khalq (PMOI/MEK). But despite this effort to stamp out the leading resistance group, the MEK remained an underground force for pro-democratic activism.

Iran’s current Supreme Leader recently took the unusual step of acknowledging the leading role played by MEK activists in the latest protests. “These incidents had been organized, and the MEK implemented the plans,” Ali Khamenei said in a speech on January 9. “The MEK had prepared for this months ago and its media outlets had called for it.”

On January 27, the Deputy for Political Affairs for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), said, “The leaders and those inciting the protests.…. were from the ‘Hypocrites’ (the pejorative term with which the regime describes the MEK).

The recent popular uprising are testaments to the fortitude of the Iranian people in the face of persistent political repression and a lack of serious support from the Western world. Europe can reclaim its human rights credentials today, if the European Parliament responds to calls for an international commission of inquiry into the ongoing human rights abuses committed against Iranian protesters and activists of every stripe.

Reports continue to trickle out of Iran on a near-daily basis regarding people who have been tortured and killed for their contribution to the latest push for regime change. These reports will only continue to worsen as long as Europe remains silent, especially if that silence is accompanied by trade agreements and normalized relations.

Iran’s economy is concentrated at Khamenei’s headquarters and in the hands of the Revolutionary Guards. Doing business with this regime will only fuel its killing machine and its export of war and terrorism.

By sanctioning the regime and making business conditional upon improvements in these areas, Europe can do more than just help to mitigate the present crackdown; it can help the Iranian people to ultimately achieve their long-frustrated goals of freedom and democratic governance. That message of support can be greatly strengthened by reversing the longstanding Western silence on past crimes like the 1988 massacre.

Representatives Michael McCaul (R-TX), Ed Royce (R-CA), and Eliot Engel (D-NY) are among the original cosponsors of H. Res. 188, which condemns the Iranian regime that incident and calls for a United Nations investigation aimed at bringing its main perpetrators to justice.

The Resolution referred to a November 2, 2007, report by Amnesty International, which said, ‘‘between 27 July 1988 and the end of [1988], thousands of political prisoners [in Iran], including prisoners of conscience, were executed in prisons nationwide.”

The very people responsible of the 1988 massacre are in power today and are torturing and murdering the 2018 protesters.

The European Parliament should introduce and quickly pass a similar resolution on the 1988 massacre, and then use it as a jumping-off point for more explicit expressions of support for the Iranian Resistance and its mission to secure a free, democratic future for the Iranian nation.

Column by Moe Alafchi. Mr. Alafchi is president of Association of Iranian-Americans in New York

 

February 11, 2018

Internationally renowned and leading Pakistani human rights advocate Asma Jahangir has died, a family member said Sunday, in a stinging blow to the country’s embattled rights community.

She was appointed United Nations Special Rapporteur for human rights in Iran in September 2016 and delivered regular reports on the prevailing situation in the country to U.N. bodies.

Jahangir who was 66 died of cardiac arrest, according to her sister. “Unfortunately we have lost her,” Hina Jilani, also a prominent rights activist, told AFP.

Jahangir’s supporters and former opponents alike took to social media to offer their condolences and expressed shock at the news of her death. “Asma Jahangir was the bravest human being I ever knew. Without her the world is less,” wrote prominent Pakistani lawyer Salman Akram Raja.

“I and many others didn’t agree with some of her views. But she was a titan. And one of the brightest and bravest ever produced by this country,” wrote journalist Wajahat Khan on Twitter.

“Deeply saddened by the news of sudden demise of renowned lawyer and human rights activist Asma Jahangir sahiba. Pakistan has lost a passionate champion of human rights and a staunch supporter of democracy. May her soul rest in peace!,” Punjab’s provincial chief Shebaz Sharif tweeted.

Jahangir received France’s highest civilian award in 2014 and Sweden’s alternative to the Nobel Prize for her decades of rights work. Few Pakistani rights activists have achieved the credibility of Jahangir.

She braved death threats, beatings and imprisonment to win landmark human rights cases and stand up to dictators.

There is still terrible violence against women, discrimination against minorities and near-slavery for bonded laborers, but Jahangir told AFP during an interview in 2014 that human rights causes have made greater strides in Pakistan than it may appear.

“There was a time that human rights was not even an issue in this country. Then prisoners’ rights became an issue,” she said. “Women’s rights was thought of as a Western concept. Now people do talk about women’s rights — political parties talk about it, even religious parties talk about it.”

Jahangir secured a number of victories during her life, from winning freedom for bonded laborers from their “owners” through pioneering litigation to a landmark court case that allowed women to marry of their own volition.

She was also been an outspoken critic of the country’s powerful military establishment, including during her stint as the first-ever female leader of Pakistan’s top bar association. She was arrested in 2007 by the government of then military ruler Pervez Musharraf, and in 2012 claimed her life was in danger from the country’s feared Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) spy agency.

 

Ken Blackwell      Jan 26, 2018
On November 9, 1978, the US Ambassador to Tehran, William Sullivan sent shock waves through the foreign policy establishment with a diplomatic cable to the White House titled, “Thinking the unthinkable. Iran without the Shah.” The Iranian monarchy had been a US ally for decades but in less than three months, the Shah and the monarchy were history.

Pundits were surprised by that change, and they were surprised again when Iran erupted at the end of 2017 and beginning of 2018. As the principal opposition movement, the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK) played an important role in organizing the protests and breaking the mullahs’ censorship with news about them. Among this news were reports that protests had emerged in more than 140 localities.

In an era of social media, it was the protesters who sent the “cables”. The message was plain and simple. With chants like “down with Rouhani”, “down with Khamenei”, and “no to reformers, no to hardliners; this game is over”, the Iranian people clearly communicated that they want regime change and they want it now.

Some 50 protesters were shot dead by security forces and the Revolutionary Guards. And according to the MEK at least 8,000 defenseless protesters were arrested. (Regime officials have acknowledged 3,700.) Reliable reports indicate that at least ten protesters have been killed under torture in prison. Some were then placed in front of their parents’ houses. A number of protesters are missing and there is no news of their condition.

For years the mullahs and their advocates convinced foreign policymakers that the opposition was limited to a number of exiles abroad and that inside Iran there are only the regime’s two factions. The protests completely debunked this narrative.

On January 9, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei blamed the US for plotting the protests with the MEK. “The MEK had prepared for this months ago,” he said, adding, “The MEK’s media outlets had called for it.”

It is a conventional gambit of despots who are rejected by their own people, to blame foreign powers. The uprising was not a conspiracy by foreign powers; rather it discredited the Obama administration and the Europeans’ appeasement of the ruling theocracy.

Very much to their credit, President Trump and Vice President Pence quickly and repeatedly expressed political support for the brave Iranians and their just demands. US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley made commendable efforts to take the issue to the UN Security Council.

The uprising showed that the multi-billion dollar windfall from the nuclear deal did not benefit the people. Rather, the mullahs used the political and economic benefits of the deal for further human rights abuses and to intensify their war efforts in the region. But these interventions have only made the regime more fragile.

The uprising was a revolt for freedom, popular sovereignty, social justice, and prosperity. It showed that Iranian society is in an explosive state, simmering with discontent. It showed that the regime is much weaker than perceived.

The mullahs have been able to contain the protests for the time being but the forces that brought millions to the streets are still working and more eruptions loom on the horizon.

As Maryam Rajavi, the president of the National Council of Resistance of Iran put it, “The mullahs cannot prevent the resurgence of the uprisings because they only depend on their deeply-hated repressive organs. They have lost the most important component of their power to enchain the society…The Iranian society will not return to the conditions preceding the uprising, nor is the religious dictatorship capable of regaining its previous balance.”

Scores of brave protesters who have broken the ayatollahs censorship have told the world that they are more determined than ever and that none of these brutal measures will break their convictions. They vowed that they will not relent until they reach their goal: To bring down the theocracy and establish democracy in Iran.

It is a moral imperative for the US and the whole of the West to stand on their side. Specifically, we should demand the immediate release of protesters who were detained.

As Mrs. Rajavi told major political groups in the Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe on January 24, “All governments should adopt effective measures and binding decisions to compel the religious dictatorship ruling Iran to release the prisoners of the uprising, uphold freedom of expression and association, end repression and lift the compulsory veil.”

The US should keep the moral high ground, lead the way internationally, and hold Tehran accountable for its treatment of protesters. The regime must understand that it has to pay a high price for opening fire on demonstrators and killing them under torture. It is sad that Europe has chosen to ignore these issues in favor of economic considerations, but when the US moves to the correct side of history, Europe has no choice but to follow.

Ambassador Haley rightly suggested that the US demand a hearing at the UN. She should urge the High Commissioner for Human Rights to form a committee to investigate arbitrary arrests and the deaths of detainees. But whatever the means, we must keep focused on this issue. Remaining silent is the worst thing we can do for Iran’s protesters.

As Martin Luther King said, “In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.” But surely the Iranian people’s friends in the free world will not be silent.

After all, this is a moment the world has long been waiting for, a crossroads where we can achieve what seemed unthinkable just a few weeks ago: Iran freed from the clutches of ayatollahs.

Ken Blackwell was U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Human Rights Commission from 1991-93. He received the Superior Honor Award from the Bush (41) and Clinton administrations.

https://townhall.com/columnists/kenblackwell/2018/01/26/liberate-iran-demand-release-of-detained-protesters-n2440195?utm_source=January+30%2C+2018&utm_campaign=IWR&utm_medium=email

 

November 14, 2017

The United Nations Third Committee’s Adoption of the resolution citing human rights abuses in Iran, for the 64th times is welcomed but no enough.

Association of Iranian Americans in New York welcomes the 64th U.N. resolution condemning the violations of human rights in Iran adopted on November 14, 2017 by the U.N. Third Committee. The time has come for the international community and especially the UN Security Council to undertake effective measures against the religious fascism ruling Iran for its systematic violations of human rights in Iran, particularly the brutal executions that are carried out non-stop, and many in public.

If adoption of resolutions after resolutions, years after years has not swayed the Iranian ruler to change course, why do we think this time will be different? If we want to live in a world that honors human dignity and adheres to the Charter of Human Rights, there has to be accountability and consequence in response to all cases of serious human rights violations, otherwise no rogue nations, like Iran would be obliged to honor.

One of the most brutal crime in the recent history in Iran is the massacre of political prisoners in the summer of 1988 where thirty thousands were executed based on a religious fatwa, and many clerical regime’s agencies and senior officials were involved or complicit. Even today, some of these officials have the audacity to defend the crime and have so far remained immune from prosecution. Therefore, the international community faces a great test in investigating this monstrous crime against humanity. In this regard, the U.S. House of Representatives should be commended for introducing House Resolution 188, “urging the U.N. to create a Commission of Inquiry to fully investigate the massacre…”

Experience has proven that Iran’s ruler will not change course until they feel the consequences which is why AIAINY echoes the U.S. House Resolution 188 that already has more than 60 bipartisan members of the House cosponsoring it.

Association of Iranian Americans in New York

The Text of

H.RES. 188

Condemning the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran for the 1988 massacre of political prisoners and calling for justice for the victims.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
March 9, 2017
Mr. McCaul (for himself, Mr. Royce of California, Mr. Engel, Mrs. Comstock, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Keating, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Young of Alaska, and Ms. Judy Chu of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

RESOLUTION

Condemning the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran for the 1988 massacre of political prisoners and calling for justice for the victims.

Whereas over a 4-month period in 1988, the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran carried out the barbaric mass executions of thousands of political prisoners and many unrelated political groups;

Whereas according to a report by the Iran Human Rights Documentation Center, the massacre was carried out pursuant to a fatwa, or religious decree, issued by then-Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, that targeted the People’s Mojahedin of Iran (PMOI), also known as the Mujahedeen-e-Khalq (MEK);

Whereas according to a November 2, 2007, report by Amnesty International, “between 27 July 1988 and the end of that year, thousands of political prisoners [in Iran], including prisoners of conscience, were executed in prisons nationwide”;

Whereas the killings were carried out on the orders of a judge, an official from the Ministry of Intelligence, and a state prosecutor, known to the prisoners as “Death Commissions” which undertook proceedings in a manner designed to eliminate the regime’s opponents;

Whereas those personally responsible for these mass executions include senior officials serving in the current Government of Iran;

Whereas prisoners were reportedly brought before the commissions and briefly questioned about their political affiliation, and any prisoner who refused to renounce his or her affiliation with groups perceived as enemies by the regime was then taken away for execution;

Whereas the victims included thousands of people, including teenagers and pregnant women, imprisoned merely for participating in peaceful street protests and for possessing political reading material, many of whom had already served or were currently serving prison sentences;

Whereas prisoners were executed in groups, some in mass hangings and others by firing squad, with their bodies disposed of in mass graves;

Whereas according to Amnesty International, “the majority of those killed were supporters of the PMOI, but hundreds of members and supporters of other political groups … were also among the execution victims”;

Whereas later waves of executions targeted religious minorities, such as members of the Baha’i faith, many of whom were often subjected to brutal torture before they were killed;

Whereas the families of the executed were denied information about their loved ones and were prohibited from mourning them in public;

Whereas in a recently disclosed audiotape, the late Hussein Ali Montazeri, a grand ayatollah who served as Khomeini’s chief deputy, noted the regime’s efforts to target the MEK and said that the 1988 mass killings were “the greatest crime committed during the Islamic Republic, for which history will condemn us”;

Whereas the current Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was reportedly aware of, and later publicly condoned the massacre;

Whereas in violation of its international obligations, the Government of Iran continues to systematically perpetrate gross violations of the fundamental human rights of the Iranian people; and

Whereas the November 2, 2007, report from Amnesty International concluded “there should be no impunity for human rights violations, no matter where or when they took place. The 1988 executions should be subject to an independent impartial investigation, and all those responsible should be brought to justice, and receive appropriate penalties”: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) condemns the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran for the 1988 massacre, and for denying the evidence of this manifest set of crimes against humanity;

(2) urges the Administration and United States allies to publicly condemn the massacre, and pressure the Government of Iran to provide detailed information to the families of the victims about their loved ones and their final resting places; and

(3) urges the United Nations Special Rap­por­teur on the human rights situation in Iran and the United Nations Human Rights Council to create a Commission of Inquiry to fully investigate the massacre and to gather evidence and identify the names and roles of specific perpetrators with a view towards bringing them to justice.

October 25, 2017

Association of Iranian Americans in New York applauds newly announced U.S. policy changes towards Iran.  We specially commend the administration for calling out Iran for its nefarious acts of terror, human rights violations, and support for rogue regional/international elements. We believe that a more robust and active U.S. leadership to challenge the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) is urgently needed.

Designation of the IRGC as a terrorist organization is certainly the right but long overdue policy move.  The IRGC is first and foremost, in charge of keeping the religious tyranny afloat through suppression of the Iranian people.  Blacklisting of this nefarious organization, if fully enforced, will weaken Iranian regime’s ability to suffocate & suppress the Iranian people.  Additionally, this step can help the international community repulse IRGC’s terrorist activities in the Middle East and beyond.

Our community believes that Iranian regime officials should be held to account for the indiscriminate slaughter of the Iranian people, including the 1988 massacre of some 30,000 political prisoners.  We call on the administration to work with the United Nations to refer this file to the U.N. Security Council and the International Criminal Court. We thank our congressional delegation for their tireless support and assistance in this matter.

AIAINY calls on the United States government to adopt the policy of empowering the Iranian people by officially recognizing the democratic Iranian opposition movement.  It is our humble belief that collectively, these steps will weaken the barbaric rulers of Tehran and help usher a more prosperous and peaceful period for everyone.

Association of Iranian Americans in New York

August 31, 2017

GENEVA – The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in Iran, Asma Jahangir, today expressed her deep concern about the situation of a number of prisoners who have been on prolonged hunger strike to protest against their transfer to a high-security section of Rajai-Shahr prison in Karaj, West of Tehran, and about their treatment while in detention.

“I am deeply alarmed by reports about the deteriorating medical conditions of the prisoners on hunger strike, and that their torture and ill-treatment have continued since their transfer,” Ms. Jahangir said.

Over the past few weeks, 53 prisoners, including more than 15 Baha’is, were transferred without prior notice and without being informed of the reasons for their transfer. None of them was allowed to take their personal belongings, including their medicines. They have also reportedly been deprived of hygiene products, adequate clothing, adequate medical care and food they purchased with their own money.

“Depriving prisoners of having family contact, lawyers and adequate medical care is contrary to international law,” the rights expert said.

“I urge the Government of Iran to look for a prompt solution to the extreme situation created by the hunger strike through good faith dialogue about the grievances and underlying human rights violations, ensuring full respect for their dignity and autonomy,” the expert concluded.

This statement has been endorsed by the Special Rapporteurs on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, Mr. Dainius Pûras, and on freedom of religion or belief, Mr. Ahmed Shaheed.

ENDS

Ms. Asma Jahangir (Pakistan) was designated as the Special Rapporteur on the situation of  human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran by the Human Rights Council in September 2016 Ms. Jahangir was elected as President of the Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan and as Chairperson of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan. Over the years, she has been recognized both nationally and internationally for her contribution to the cause of human rights and is a recipient of major human rights awards. She has worked extensively in the field of women’s rights, protection of religious minorities and in eliminating bonded labour. She is a former Special Rapporteur on summary executions, and on freedom of religion.

The Special Rapporteurs and Working Groups are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures’ experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity.